2025 consolidated revenue rose 19.8% year-on-year to KRW 43.4bn from KRW 36.2bn in 2024, but operating profit fell 64.4% to KRW 0.86bn from KRW 2.41bn, with operating margin sliding sharply from 6.7% to 2.0%.
Net income attributable to owners actually increased to KRW 1.59bn from KRW 0.83bn in 2024, moving in the opposite direction from operating profit. 2023 was a loss-making year with revenue of KRW 30.5bn, an operating loss of KRW 5.24bn, and a net loss attributable to owners of KRW 2.38bn, while 2022 was profitable with revenue of KRW 50.7bn, operating profit of KRW 1.31bn, and net income of KRW 2.26bn, underscoring significant volatility over the past four fiscal years.
On a quarterly basis, revenue of KRW 7.06bn, operating profit of KRW 0.16bn, and a net loss to owners of KRW 0.38bn in Q2 2025 improved to revenue of KRW 10.4bn, operating profit of KRW 0.84bn, and net income of KRW 0.34bn in Q3, and revenue grew further to KRW 15.5bn in Q4, where despite an operating loss of KRW 0.82bn the company posted a large net profit of KRW 1.63bn.
However, Q1 2026 revenue plunged to KRW 5.05bn (down 51.6% year-on-year), with an operating loss of KRW 2.15bn and a net loss of KRW 1.65bn, attributed to submarine fuel cell module delivery timing, intensifying competition in the building fuel cell market, and a concentration of hydrogen station orders in the second half.
In Q2 2026, revenue reached a quarterly record of KRW 17.8bn, yet the operating loss widened further to KRW 3.23bn and the net loss to KRW 3.79bn, an unusual pattern of simultaneous revenue growth and deteriorating profitability.
Part of this divergence appears linked to subsidiary Bumhan Materials, which produces the core MEA raw material and had been front-loading production-base setup costs since 2025 ahead of full-scale output in 2026, weighing on consolidated results, even as the parent company's standalone operating margin actually improved from 10.7% (nine-month cumulative through Q3 2024) to 12.8% (nine-month cumulative through Q3 2025).
Overall, the volatility in consolidated results can be interpreted as a combination of a new subsidiary's early-stage investment costs and the overlapping timing of defense and hydrogen-station revenue recognition.