End demand is expanding in both the U.S. and Korea. U.S. solar installations reached 50GW in 2024, up 21% year on year, and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission data showed more than 75% of U.S. capacity additions from January to September 2025 came from solar.
Following the OBBBA enacted in July 2025, a rush to begin construction to qualify for tax credits lifted the company's U.S. revenue from KRW 45.3bn in 2024 to KRW 161.9bn in 2025 (NICE Investors Service commentary, April 2026).
In the same commentary, NICE Investors Service said tighter constraints on Chinese supply chains under U.S. foreign entity of concern rules leave room for benefit at companies with non-Chinese supply chains. Domestic policy is a large swing factor.
On August 11, 2026 the Ministry of Climate, Energy and Environment said the Cabinet approved an enforcement-decree amendment capping setbacks from residential areas at 200m and abolishing road-based setbacks, following the law revision that takes effect on September 18.
Since 129 of Korea's 228 basic local governments have set their own setback ordinances, the pace of ordinance revision will shape actual siting conditions. On the other side sits trade policy.
Under Section 232, the U.S. will apply minimum import prices to polysilicon, ingots, wafers, cells and modules from December 4 and add a 15% ad valorem tariff on derivatives, replacing the cell and module safeguard that expired in February 2026 and extending coverage upstream.
For Korea, Japan, the EU, Taiwan and Switzerland, which have trade agreements with the U.S., the Section 232 tariff and most-favored-nation duty combine to a total of 15%.
Within Korea's solar sector, the company sits differently from upstream polysilicon and cell names by combining cell and module manufacturing with a solutions arm, while relying more on Korea-based production for exports than peers with large integrated U.S. plants.