KOSDAQElectronic Components106080

KEM Tech

₩1,650 0.00%2026-10-02 close
Market Cap
₩9.5B
Turnover
₩0
Volume
0 shares
Shares out.
5.8M
PER
—
PBR
0.4×
EPS
-₩2,201
Dividend Yield
0.00%

PER, EPS, PBR and BPS are calculated in-house from the last 4 quarters (2025Q3–2026Q2) · Dividend yield is based on ₩0 per share · Prices as of the 2026-10-02 close

01

Report overview

Trading Halt and Delisting Review Amid Deepening Losses

KEMTech's shares have been halted from trading since March 2026 following a disclaimer of audit opinion, and the company is now under a KOSDAQ improvement period pending a delisting review, while quarterly revenue has contracted for five consecutive quarters even as it pursues secondary-battery parts expansion amid an ongoing technology-leak trial.

  1. 1

    Trading has been halted since March 12, 2026 due to a disclaimer of audit opinion for FY2025, followed by designation as an administrative issue and an improvement period, with a delisting review now underway.

  2. 2

    Quarterly revenue fell for five straight quarters, from roughly KRW 1.9 billion in 2Q25 to about KRW 0.3 billion in 2Q26, with operating losses recorded in every quarter of that span.

  3. 3

    FY2025 consolidated revenue dropped sharply to KRW 7.57 billion from KRW 17.62 billion a year earlier, while the operating loss widened to KRW 9.23 billion.

  4. 4

    Company personnel have been indicted over alleged leakage of national core technology related to prismatic battery can-cap assembly technology, though the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy has officially ruled that the technology does not qualify as national core or advanced technology.

  5. 5

    Capital raises have recurred, including a small third-party share allotment in December 2025 and a KRW 25 billion rights offering decided in January 2026.

02

Business structure

KEMTech, established in 2001 and listed on KOSDAQ in 2010, changed its corporate name from Hi-Sonic to its current name in February 2025. Its core product has historically been the IR filter used in smartphone camera modules, supplied to domestic and overseas mobile device makers.

Around 2025 the company expanded into secondary battery parts, positioning prismatic battery can-cap assemblies as a key product line.

The company disclosed via press releases that it signed a total of roughly KRW 180 billion in prismatic can-cap supply contracts for ESS applications across two announcements in July and October 2025.

Separately, it also runs a distribution business supplying food and beverage and daily necessities to large domestic and overseas retail networks. Headquartered in Osan, Gyeonggi Province, the company has a branch in Songpa, Seoul, and overseas subsidiaries in the United States, China, the Philippines, and Vietnam.

Its largest shareholder is HS Holdings, which owns roughly 16% of shares outstanding, with CEO Yoo Seong-jun sitting at the top of the governance structure as HS Holdings' representative and majority owner with a 51% stake.

Affiliate Daejin Advanced Materials also holds about 6% of KEMTech, tying the two companies together through both capital and personnel links.

03

Earnings trend

Quarterly revenue · Operating profit
RevenueOperating profit
Annual revenue · Operating profit
RevenueOperating profit
Quarterly results · Last 5 quarters
QuarterRevenueOperating profitOp. margin
2025Q2₩1.9B-₩2.1B−110.0%
2025Q3₩1.5B-₩2.1B−141.7%
2025Q4₩900M-₩3.7B−393.7%
2026Q1₩800M-₩3.2B−397.6%
2026Q2₩300M-₩2.6B−855.3%
Annual results
YearRevenueOperating profitNet income (parent)Op. marginROEDebt-to-equity
2022₩28.9B₩700M₩800M2.4%5.1%19.3%
2023₩5B-₩3.7B-₩11.3B−73.7%−94.6%89.3%
2024₩17.6B-₩4.3B-₩4.1B−24.7%−11.9%61.6%
2025₩7.6B-₩9.2B-₩12.7B−121.8%−42.5%74.2%

Consolidated basis (financial statements including subsidiaries) · Final figures from DART filings · Net income attributable to owners of the parent · Data as of 2026-08-23

04

Earnings analysis

Annual results show that 2022 was the only profitable year, with revenue of KRW 28.92 billion, operating profit of KRW 0.69 billion (an operating margin of 2.4%), and net income of KRW 0.79 billion.

In 2023, however, revenue collapsed to KRW 4.99 billion year-on-year, and the company swung to a large operating loss of KRW 3.68 billion and a net loss of KRW 11.29 billion.

Revenue recovered to KRW 17.62 billion in 2024, but losses persisted with an operating loss of KRW 4.35 billion and an owner-attributable net loss of KRW 4.14 billion.

In 2025, revenue fell again to KRW 7.57 billion, and losses widened further, with an operating loss of KRW 9.23 billion and an owner-attributable net loss of KRW 12.75 billion.

On a quarterly basis, revenue declined for five consecutive quarters, from KRW 1.90 billion in 2Q25 to KRW 1.50 billion in 3Q25, KRW 0.94 billion in 4Q25, KRW 0.79 billion in 1Q26, and KRW 0.31 billion in 2Q26.

Operating losses over the same span stayed in the range of roughly KRW 2 billion to KRW 3.7 billion per quarter, and the fact that loss size did not shrink proportionally with revenue suggests a combination of fixed-cost burden and possible one-off factors.

Operating cash flow was negative for four straight years from 2022 to 2025 (KRW -3.53 billion, -6.29 billion, -5.09 billion, -2.70 billion), indicating persistent cash outflow from core operations.

Total equity fell from KRW 34.73 billion in 2024 to KRW 30.00 billion in 2025, while the debt ratio rose from 61.6% to 74.2% over the same period, pointing to growing financial strain.

05

Industry analysis

The smartphone camera module component market that IR filters belong to has matured, with growth largely stalled and intense price competition among numerous domestic and overseas suppliers.

The company's newer secondary-battery parts business—prismatic battery can-cap assemblies—is tied to ESS and electric-vehicle battery demand, representing an attempt to enter a supply chain dominated by large domestic cell makers and their established materials and parts partners.

However, this new business is exposed to reputational headwinds stemming from the ongoing investigation and indictment related to alleged Samsung SDI technology leakage.

An industry source has suggested that detailed structures of prismatic can-cap components differ by customer, and that similar appearances do not necessarily constitute technology infringement when design specifications diverge.

How much of the roughly KRW 180 billion in supply contracts announced in July and October 2025 has actually translated into revenue remains unclear, given that recent quarterly revenue has instead contracted sharply.

The distribution (F&B) business appears to function as a supplementary revenue source rather than a stable cash generator. Overall, the company sits at the intersection of structural stagnation in its mature IR filter business and legal and execution risk in its newer secondary-battery parts business.

06

Outlook

The most pressing variable is whether the listing will be maintained.

Shares have been halted since March 12, 2026 due to a disclaimer of audit opinion, after which an additional delisting cause tied to the FY2025 audit opinion emerged, leading to administrative-issue designation; in May an improvement period was granted, with a delisting decision to follow once that period ends.

Whether trading resumes remains uncertain until this process concludes. The company's April 2026 designation as an unfaithful-disclosure entity, stemming from delayed disclosure of a controlling-shareholder share pledge contract, adds a further reputational burden.

Capital raising has continued, including a KRW 25 billion rights offering decided in January 2026 in addition to an earlier small third-party allotment, indicating ongoing reliance on external funding.

Whether and when the secondary-battery supply contracts translate into actual revenue is a key variable for any earnings recovery, but quarterly revenue has instead continued to shrink, so the gap between announced contracts and realized sales still needs to be confirmed.

The criminal trial over the alleged national core technology leak continues through a separate judicial process despite MOTIE's determination that the technology does not qualify as core technology, meaning legal uncertainty is likely to persist until a verdict is reached.

Governance has also shifted, with the co-CEO structure moving to a sole CEO, warranting continued attention to further changes in management stability.

07

Valuation

PER
—
PBR
0.4×
ROE
-49.1%
EPS
-₩2,201
BPS
₩4,040
Dividend per share
₩0

Because the company has not generated meaningful net income in recent years, earnings-based valuation metrics are difficult to apply meaningfully.

Looking at the relationship between share price and book value per share, both the self-calculated and KRX-reported price-to-book figures place the stock below book value per share, meaning it trades at a discount to accounting net asset value.

This discount should be read alongside the fact that total equity itself has been shrinking due to continued losses (from KRW 34.7 billion in 2024 to KRW 30.0 billion in 2025), and the qualitative composition of that net asset base also warrants scrutiny.

No dividend is currently being paid, meaning there is no shareholder return through distributions at present. Market capitalization is very small even by KOSDAQ standards, a structural feature that means a handful of trades or a single disclosure can move valuation metrics considerably.

PER, EPS, PBR and BPS are all calculated in-house (the same method as Naver and Toss) · Dividend yield = cash dividend per share from DART filings (supplemented by KRX) ÷ current price · As of 2026-08-23

08

Bull factors

Attempted Pivot to Secondary-Battery Parts

Beyond its mature IR filter business, the company has cultivated a new prismatic battery can-cap assembly business and announced a combined roughly KRW 180 billion in ESS-related supply contracts across two disclosures in July and October 2025.

This represents a strategic attempt to move away from a stagnant legacy business and into the secondary-battery value chain. If the contracts are stably reflected in actual revenue, it could mark a turning point in the company's business portfolio.

MOTIE Ruling That Technology Is Not Core Technology

In contrast to the prosecution's indictment over alleged leakage of national core technology, MOTIE has officially ruled that the prismatic battery Cap Assembly technology in question does not qualify as national core or advanced technology.

The company has publicized this official document, arguing that the government's administrative determination carries legal weight that supersedes the investigative agency's internal judgment. This could serve as a key basis for the company's defense in the ongoing trial.

Continued Fundraising Through Repeated Capital Raises

Following a small third-party share allotment in December 2025, the company decided on a KRW 25 billion rights offering in January 2026, continuing to secure external funding. This shows that investors have, at least in the short term, responded to the company's capital-raising requests. As long as such inflows continue, they may partially mitigate the risk of immediate liquidity exhaustion.

09

Bear factors

Five Straight Quarters of Revenue Decline Amid Persistent Operating Losses

Quarterly revenue fell for five consecutive quarters, from KRW 1.90 billion in 2Q25 to KRW 0.31 billion in 2Q26, with operating losses recorded in every quarter of that span. The fact that loss size did not meaningfully shrink even as revenue declined indicates a persistently heavy fixed-cost burden.

The new secondary-battery business has yet to be clearly confirmed in revenue relative to the scale of announced contracts.

Existential Risk from Ongoing Delisting Review

Trading has been halted since March 2026 due to a disclaimer of audit opinion for FY2025, and the company has since been designated an administrative issue and granted an improvement period, with a KOSDAQ delisting review now underway.

The timing of any resumption of trading remains uncertain until the improvement period concludes, and the possibility of an eventual delisting decision cannot be ruled out. This stands as the most direct risk to investors, independent of other business or earnings variables.

Ongoing Criminal Trial Over Alleged Technology Leakage

The Suwon District Prosecutors' Office indicted 15 individuals, including a former representative of Daejin Advanced Materials and KEMTech personnel, over alleged leakage of Samsung SDI's prismatic can-cap assembly technology, with four held in custody.

MOTIE's determination that the technology is not core technology is merely an administrative judgment, and the final judicial verdict is proceeding separately. Depending on the trial outcome, there could be further implications for personnel penalties, business relationships, and trust with customers.

10

Risk factors

Listing Continuity Risk

Trading has been halted due to a disclaimer of audit opinion stemming from going-concern uncertainty, and a KOSDAQ delisting review is underway following administrative-issue designation and an improvement period.

Whether trading resumes remains uncertain until the improvement period ends and a review decision is finalized. This is the foremost matter investors should monitor, independent of business or earnings developments.

Legal and Judicial Risk

Fifteen personnel have been indicted over alleged leakage of national core technology, with some held in custody as the trial proceeds. MOTIE's ruling that the technology is not core technology is an administrative determination separate from the final outcome of the criminal trial.

Regardless of the eventual verdict, the associated media coverage and controversy itself could negatively affect trust among customers and investors.

Financial Structure and Dilution Risk

Operating cash flow has been negative for four consecutive years, indicating continued cash outflow from core operations, while the debt ratio rose from 61.6% in 2024 to 74.2% in 2025.

To cover this gap, third-party and rights-offering capital raises have recurred, and further issuances could continue to dilute existing shareholders. As long as losses persist, reliance on external funding is likely to remain elevated.

11

What to watch next

  1. Conclusion of Improvement Period and Delisting Review Outcome (to be disclosed)

    Once the improvement period granted by the Korea Exchange ends, a final review on delisting will take place. This is the single most important event determining whether trading can resume.

  2. Around November 2026, 3Q26 earnings disclosure

    This will be the point to check whether the five-quarter revenue decline trend continues, and whether the secondary-battery parts supply contracts begin to show up in reported revenue.

  3. First-instance verdict in the technology-leak criminal trial (date to be announced)

    A first-instance ruling on the indicted personnel would clarify the relationship between MOTIE's non-core-technology determination and the judiciary's conclusion, and could prompt a reassessment of the company's legal risk level.

  4. Progress on payment and new-share listing for the KRW 25 billion rights offering (to be announced)

    It will be important to confirm whether the rights offering decided in January 2026 is actually completed and the resulting new-share volume, in order to gauge the progress of capital raising and the degree of shareholder dilution.

12

Overall view

KEMTech faces overlapping challenges: structural stagnation in its mature IR filter business and legal and execution risk in its newer secondary-battery parts venture, compounded by an existential listing risk stemming from the trading halt and delisting review triggered by a disclaimer of audit opinion since March 2026.

Annual results have been in the red for four of the last four years excluding 2022, and quarterly revenue has contracted for five consecutive quarters with operating losses recorded every quarter.

Operating cash flow has also been negative for four straight years, confirming a structure of continued cash outflow from core operations.

That said, MOTIE's ruling that the disputed technology is not core technology and the company's repeated capital-raising efforts can be read as attempts to secure both a legal defense and continued funding channels.

For investors, it will be important to sequentially track the outcome of the delisting review once the improvement period ends, the progress of the criminal trial, and whether the secondary-battery supply contracts materialize into revenue.

At this stage, the possibility of business restructuring and the uncertainty over the company's continued listing coexist, making a one-sided conclusion difficult to draw.

13

Sources

  1. Korea Exchange (KRX) — Prices · Market Cap · Volume
  2. FSS electronic disclosure system (DART) — Financial statements · Dividend filings
Show 18 more articles and sources
  1. kctech.com
  2. kmtech.kr
  3. public25.com
  4. mfinance.finup.co.kr
  5. edaily.co.kr
  6. kind.krx.co.kr
  7. kmtechfilm.com
  8. edaily.co.kr
  9. comp.fnguide.com
  10. datatooza.com
  11. cdn.financialreports.eu
  12. m.irgo.co.kr
  13. investing.com
  14. news.infostock.co.kr
  15. jasoseol.com
  16. v.daum.net
  17. newslock.co.kr
  18. kind.krx.co.kr

Report written 2026-09-05 · Data as of 2026-09-04

This content is AI analysis of market data and web search results, provided for information only. It is not a solicitation or recommendation to invest. Investment decisions and their consequences are the investor's own responsibility. Data may be delayed or contain errors.