KOSPISteel & Metals007280

Korea Steel

₩2,360▲ 4.66%2026-10-02 close
Market Cap
₩65.2B
Turnover
₩22,689,920
Volume
10,000 shares
Shares out.
28.7M
PER
—
PBR
0.3×
EPS
-₩69
Dividend Yield
—

PER, EPS, PBR and BPS are calculated in-house from the last 4 quarters (2025Q3–2026Q2) · Prices as of the 2026-10-02 close

01

Report overview

Section Steel & Rebar Maker, Volatile Quarters

An electric-arc-furnace steelmaker producing both section steel and rebar, the company defended profitability in 2025 but has shown swinging quarterly earnings in 2026 amid cost pressure.

  1. 1

    2025 consolidated revenue reached KRW 767.1bn with operating profit of KRW 11.7bn, defending prior-year levels while net profit turned positive.

  2. 2

    After an operating loss of about KRW 3.6bn in 1Q26, the company returned to a small operating profit of KRW 0.47bn and net profit of KRW 0.14bn in 2Q26.

  3. 3

    Core products are section steel (angles, channels) and bar steel (rebar, round bars), which accounted for roughly 27.8% and 69.4% of standalone revenue respectively as of 3Q25.

  4. 4

    The domestic rebar industry is undergoing restructuring amid construction downturn and China-driven oversupply.

  5. 5

    Accounts receivable have grown faster than sales, keeping market attention on cash-flow management.

02

Business structure

Korea Special Steel is an electric-arc-furnace steelmaker that produces billets from scrap steel and rolls them into section steel and bar steel products. Its output serves as base material for the construction, shipbuilding, automotive and machinery industries.

As of 3Q25 on a standalone basis, section steel accounted for about 27.79% of sales and bar steel (including rebar) for about 69.40%, making bar steel the larger segment.

Key customers include GS Construction, Lotte Construction, Hyundai Engineering & Construction, Daebang Construction and Heungsung Steel, with sales concentrated among construction firms and distributors.

Notably, BSM, a rebar-processing company wholly owned by GS Construction, is located near the company's rebar plant, giving it a favorable position for direct sales, and the share of GS Construction-related revenue is reported to be increasing.

The company operates three production sites—Chilseo, Sasang and Noksan—and expanded capacity from the third quarter of 2022 with a new rolling mill using updated equipment. Its strategy centers on small-batch, multi-product specialization combined with new-product development based on modern facilities.

Competitors include larger integrated players such as Hyundai Steel and Dongkuk Steel, against which the company operates a comparatively smaller, more specialized production system.

03

Earnings trend

Quarterly revenue · Operating profit
RevenueOperating profit
Annual revenue · Operating profit
RevenueOperating profit
Quarterly results · Last 5 quarters
QuarterRevenueOperating profitOp. margin
2025Q2₩214.2B₩9.8B4.6%
2025Q3₩188.3B₩400M0.2%
2025Q4₩178.4B-₩700M−0.4%
2026Q1₩210.1B-₩3.6B−1.7%
2026Q2₩255.2B₩500M0.2%
Annual results
YearRevenueOperating profitNet income (parent)Op. marginROEDebt-to-equity
2022₩795.9B₩30.6B₩40.6B3.8%20.3%174.3%
2023₩830.4B₩47.3B₩28.1B5.7%12.4%147.7%
2024₩768.8B₩10.6B-₩2.9B1.4%−1.3%148.0%
2025₩767.1B₩11.7B₩3B1.5%1.4%158.5%

Consolidated basis (financial statements including subsidiaries) · Final figures from DART filings · Net income attributable to owners of the parent · Data as of 2026-08-23

04

Earnings analysis

Annual results show operating margin improving from 3.8% in 2022 (revenue KRW 795.9bn, operating profit KRW 30.6bn) to 5.7% in 2023 (revenue KRW 830.4bn, operating profit KRW 47.3bn), before revenue fell to KRW 768.8bn in 2024 with margin dropping to 1.4% and net profit swinging to a loss of KRW 2.92bn.

In 2025, revenue held roughly steady at KRW 767.1bn while operating profit rose slightly to KRW 11.7bn (1.5% margin) and net profit turned positive at KRW 2.99bn. This is viewed as a relatively resilient outcome given that many electric-arc-furnace steelmakers posted losses during the period.

On a quarterly basis, 2Q25 showed a strong run with revenue of KRW 214.2bn, operating profit of KRW 9.81bn and net profit of KRW 6.09bn, but operating profit slumped to KRW 0.39bn in 3Q25, and 4Q25 recorded an operating loss of KRW 0.72bn and a net loss of KRW 1.46bn, reflecting the downturn in the industry.

In 1Q26, despite revenue rising to KRW 210.1bn, the company posted an operating loss of KRW 3.61bn and a net loss of KRW 2.75bn as cost pressure intensified. Revenue jumped to KRW 255.2bn in 2Q26, and the company returned to a small operating profit of KRW 0.47bn and net profit of KRW 0.14bn.

Over the trailing four quarters (3Q25–2Q26), cumulative owner net profit was a loss of about KRW 4.01bn, indicating the annual profitability recovery has not yet been fully replicated at the recent quarterly level.

This volatility appears closely tied to shifting spreads among scrap-steel input costs, foreign exchange rates and product selling prices.

05

Industry analysis

Domestic steel consumption in Korea has continued to decline even after falling below the 50-million-ton threshold in 2024, with the industry estimating 2026 annual domestic demand at around 45.1 million tons.

Construction-related steel products such as rebar and pipe are expected to see a delayed recovery given the slow rebound in construction activity.

Against this backdrop, the government announced a steel industry upgrade plan in November 2025, and the National Assembly passed a special act on steel industry competitiveness and carbon-neutral transition (the 'K-Steel Act') on November 27 of that year.

As a result, larger players such as Hyundai Steel have moved to preemptively cut capacity, closing a 750,000-ton rebar production line at its Incheon plant.

However, government-procurement rebar orders switched to a competitive bidding system starting in the second half of 2025, reducing guaranteed demand and intensifying competition.

China-driven low-cost oversupply, rising trade protectionism, and currency volatility remain persistent cost and pricing pressures across the industry.

Within this environment, Korea Special Steel was cited as the only rebar producer to grow sales in the first half of 2025, though this was accompanied by an expansion in direct sales and a rise in accounts receivable.

As many EAF producers pursue capacity cuts and restructuring, the company's relative position is likely to hinge on cost management and its product-specialization strategy.

06

Outlook

The company has stated it aims to strengthen competitiveness through inventory management for stable raw-material sourcing, new-product development based on modern facilities, and a small-batch, multi-product specialization strategy.

In 1Q26, despite standalone revenue rising 12.8% year over year, the company posted an operating loss, which it attributed to slowing global steel demand, higher raw-material costs from a weak currency, and China-driven oversupply.

Industry-wide, forecasts suggest that semiconductor plant investment and third-new-town development could generate some additional rebar and section-steel demand, though the volumes involved are not large, raising the possibility of intensified order competition among producers.

Steel was excluded from Korea's 2026 tax reform's domestic-production tax-credit list, but the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy stated in August that he would coordinate with the finance ministry to include it—though this remains a coordination stance rather than confirmed policy.

If capacity-reduction roadmaps from larger players such as Hyundai Steel and Dongkuk Steel become concrete during 2026, this could affect industry-wide supply-demand normalization, making related developments worth monitoring.

As government-procurement rebar shifts further toward competitive bidding, how the company's expanding direct-sales channel (including GS Construction affiliate BSM) affects future order stability is also a point to watch.

07

Valuation

PER
—
PBR
0.3×
ROE
-1.9%
EPS
-₩69
BPS
₩7,179
Dividend per share
—

The shares tend to trade at a substantial discount to net asset value, a pattern commonly observed across the domestic steel sector as a whole.

While annual results swung from a loss in 2024 to a profit in 2025, quarterly earnings have fluctuated again in 2026, making the direction of profitability a matter open to differing interpretations. No disclosed per-share cash dividend information was identified, limiting the basis for assessing dividend appeal.

When considering valuation, it is useful to reference both the historical trading range over recent years and the recent volatility in results, as a single-point-in-time multiple alone offers limited insight for this stock.

PER, EPS, PBR and BPS are all calculated in-house (the same method as Naver and Toss) · Dividend yield = cash dividend per share from DART filings (supplemented by KRX) ÷ current price · As of 2026-08-23

08

Bull factors

Expanding direct sales for channel stability

Korea Special Steel has been expanding direct sales to construction firms and processors rather than relying solely on distributors, with GS Construction affiliate BSM located near its production plant offering a locational advantage.

As a result, the share of GS Construction-related revenue is reported to be increasing, which could support stable sales channels. It was also cited as the only rebar producer to post revenue growth in the first half of 2025.

Relatively resilient 2025 earnings defense

While many EAF steelmakers posted losses in 2025, Korea Special Steel maintained revenue near prior-year levels, slightly improved its operating margin, and returned to net profit. The newer rebar business is said to have created synergy with the existing section-steel business, easing cost pressure. This can be read as a case of relative resilience during an industry downturn.

Potential benefit from policy-driven restructuring

The K-Steel Act passed in November 2025 and the government's steel industry upgrade plan are designed to encourage voluntary capacity cuts and support for oversupplied product categories, with larger players already reducing capacity.

Progress on this restructuring could contribute to industry-wide supply-demand normalization. However, the actual scale and timing of any benefit will depend on follow-up regulations and individual companies' responses.

09

Bear factors

Sharp quarterly earnings swings in 2026

Despite revenue growth, 1Q26 posted an operating loss of about KRW 3.61bn and a net loss of about KRW 2.75bn, before swinging back to a small profit in 2Q26—illustrating wide earnings amplitude.

Cumulative owner net profit over the trailing four quarters remains in loss territory, showing how exposed results are to shifts in cost-price spreads.

Construction downturn and shift in public-sector demand

Construction, the primary end market for rebar, remains in a downturn, and the industry expects 2026 domestic steel consumption to fall to around 45.1 million tons. The shift of government-procurement rebar orders to competitive bidding may make securing stable volumes more difficult than before. The timing of a full construction-investment recovery remains uncertain.

Rising receivables and cash-flow management burden

In 1H25, growth in standalone accounts receivable significantly outpaced revenue growth, lowering receivables turnover, and operating cash flow was reported to have declined year over year. This raises concerns about delayed collection tied to expanding credit sales. If this pattern persists amid an industry downturn, it could strain cash generation.

10

Risk factors

Raw material and FX risk

Fluctuations in scrap-steel prices and the won-dollar exchange rate directly affect costs. Higher raw-material procurement costs from a weak currency were cited as a key reason for the 1Q26 operating loss. When the cost-price spread narrows, profitability can deteriorate quickly.

Industry restructuring and demand risk

Demand for construction-grade steel is closely tied to the construction cycle, and a recovery is expected to be delayed even in 2026. The simultaneous shift of government rebar procurement to competitive bidding and capacity cuts by larger players could reshape the competitive landscape.

Smaller and mid-sized producers may find themselves in a relatively less favorable position during this restructuring.

Receivables and cash-flow risk

As direct-sales expansion increases the share of credit transactions (such as bills), the risk of delayed receivables collection can rise. Indeed, in 1H25 receivables growth outpaced revenue growth, lowering turnover. If this pattern recurs, it could place ongoing pressure on operating cash flow.

11

What to watch next

  1. September 2026 regular National Assembly session

    Whether the steel industry will be included in the domestic-production tax credit under the government's tax reform bill is expected to be discussed; if confirmed, it could ease cost pressure.

  2. Mid-November 2026 (expected 3Q report filing)

    It will be worth checking whether the modest 2Q26 profit trend continues into 3Q26 results, and how receivables and cash-flow metrics evolve.

  3. During Q4 2026

    Progress on capacity-reduction roadmaps by larger players such as Hyundai Steel and Dongkuk Steel, and whether industry-wide supply-demand normalization is materializing, warrant monitoring.

  4. Upon announcement of government rebar tender results in H2 2026

    It will be important to confirm how actual order volumes and allocations play out following the shift of government rebar procurement to competitive bidding.

12

Overall view

Korea Special Steel is an EAF steelmaker producing both section steel and bar steel (rebar), which defended revenue and returned to net profit in 2025, though quarterly earnings have swung again in 2026.

Amid persistent structural pressure from the construction downturn, China-driven oversupply, and the shift of government rebar procurement to competitive bidding, offsetting factors such as expanding direct sales channels and policy-driven restructuring under the K-Steel Act coexist.

The cash-flow management issue tied to rising receivables also warrants continued observation. On a trailing four-quarter basis, the company remains in a net loss position, meaning the annual profit recovery has not yet been fully mirrored at the quarterly level.

On valuation, the stock shows the net-asset discount pattern common across the sector, and tracking earnings direction and industry conditions together appears more useful than focusing on any single multiple.

Going forward, it will be worth sequentially monitoring confirmable events such as policy developments, raw material and FX trends, and upcoming earnings releases.

13

Sources

  1. Korea Exchange (KRX) — Prices · Market Cap · Volume
  2. FSS electronic disclosure system (DART) — Financial statements · Dividend filings
Show 18 more articles and sources
  1. comp.wisereport.co.kr
  2. investing.com
  3. m.irgo.co.kr
  4. comp.fnguide.com
  5. markets.hankyung.com
  6. judal.co.kr
  7. stockplus.com
  8. m.saramin.co.kr
  9. m.thinkpool.com
  10. ferrotimes.com
  11. valueline.co.kr
  12. catch.co.kr
  13. deepsearch.com
  14. kind.krx.co.kr
  15. ibtomato.com
  16. nicebizinfo.com
  17. ygdata.kr
  18. steeldaily.co.kr

Report written 2026-09-05 · Data as of 2026-09-04

This content is AI analysis of market data and web search results, provided for information only. It is not a solicitation or recommendation to invest. Investment decisions and their consequences are the investor's own responsibility. Data may be delayed or contain errors.